Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 6,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
United States in 2015, where Judge Hardiman affirmed a lower court’s holding that a wife could not recover her portion of a tax refund that was used to pay her husband’s tax penalties, because she could not d [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
JG Club Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Some choice words from the proceeding include Justice Quinn stating, “Here, a husband and wife have been marinating in a mutual hatred so intense as to surely amount to a personality disorder requiring treatment. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
However, as a noted resident, and as was the custom of the time, one’s social activities were often published in the local newspaper whether it be for husband or wife. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
Some councils will also impose a penalty on a wife who seeks divorce, by requiring her to forfeit her mahr or dower; the money which her husband promised to her upon their marriage. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The lawyers were accused of stealing from the estate of a murder victim by accepting legal fees from his wife, who first inherited her husband's estate but ultimately pleaded guilty to a murder-for-hire plot. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Ross v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:11 am
Husband and wife Michael and Janet Erwin owned a farm. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
A.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
– – (2019)(attorneys violated Rules 1.9 & 1.10, where attorney representing husband in divorce left her law practice and joined attorney who was representing wife in divorce and both attorneys thereafter continued to represent wife without obtaining informed consent from husband). [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am
The judgement referenced text messages by the wife, which were consistently affectionate and contained “expressions such as ‘honey’ and so-called emoji, that is, small colorful pictures, in the form of hearts and kisses”; the husband’s messages, on the other hand, had been taciturn, slow in the making, and devoid of pet names or emoji. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:02 am
Maintenance Award Should Not Provide for an Automatic Increase upon the Prospective Emancipation of Each of Parties' Children In O’Brien v O’Brien, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4839062 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the Supreme Court found that the plaintiff former wife had an annual income of $33,262 from all sources, and the defendant former husband had an annual income of $115,747 from all sources. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The legal question for the court in Devorah H. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Civil Union Act itself was short, since it globally amended all statutes referring to “husband” or “wife” with “or civil union partner” and marriage with “or civil union. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Recently, the November/December issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (IPRax) was published. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
In a guest post, HH Peter Collier KC looks critically at the controversy between the treatment of the institution of Holy Matrimony and the institution of civil marriage as distinct realities The note from the Legal Office Prayers of Love and Faith, GS 1339 summarises the legal background to the decision of the House of Bishops that it should commend Prayers of Love and Faith, a draft of which is contained in Annex B to GS 2289. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
Her husband watched the proceedings by livestream from the British consulate in Istanbul. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
" I have found only one case expressly upholding such a catchall injunction against a First Amendment challenge, and there the decision was heavily influenced by the interest in protecting the parties' children—the injunction had been entered as a result of contentious divorce, and barred the ex-husband from defaming his ex-wife. [read post]
