Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 8,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am
See, e.g., Pollack v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:11 pm
It cited Turner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
FTC + State AGs Looking to Make Money? [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:10 am
Counsel Fees Are Not Qualified As Support – Think Again The trial court relied on Orlowski v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
19 May 2018, 3:17 pm
In D.V. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
On abortion, for instance, Gonzales v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The conduct was certainly disturbing, but the court, in Washington v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
The court also rejected 3Taps’ attempt to invoke the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
