Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 12,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2015, 2:17 pm
In contrast to this level of realism, Fury Road turns the dial one more, to eleven, for that push over the cliff. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:54 am
The level of technical sophistication in keycard v. phone is different. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
SD is generically mixed with some levels too high and too low. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
First, there are compelling arguments not only for admitting but also for excluding the public; second, academic libraries admit or exclude the public based on their individual circumstances, such as budget, staffing level, and location, that is, whether the sheer number of people in the community using the academic library threatens to overwhelm the primary patrons the library has been created to serve. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am
Another legal principle relied upon by the judge founded on the famous case of Armory v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:26 am
In Vialpando v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Rightsowners know there’s no impact on the level of infringement. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
I think we’ve made progress in helping people understand their rights. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:42 am
A: I love to work with nice people like professors, but we have small bandwidth to help people. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:30 am
United States, and Yates v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:40 pm
It is well known that public speaking ranks high on the top ten fears most people have. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
We’re trying to consider potential narrowing so that people feel that the exemption would be consistent w/congressional intent and the goals of the proceeding. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
MDEQ v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:00 am
The most active arguments were WISAM 1 Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm
People are complex. [read post]
