Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 19,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
For many people, a life in MCS is a more terrifying prospect than a purely vegetative existence. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 2:49 pm
” People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
In Grade v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
It has been to the Supreme Court before in the form of Armstrong v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:52 pm
The court spent more time on the substantive reasonableness argument, whch was that the sentence was too long. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm
Cadman, R. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
Travel v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
Schwab v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
Schwab v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
In addition, the hearing will explore the authorities available to the Administration and the international community to protect the people of Hong Kong, Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and others. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm
McCraney" "MySpace Photo and Internet Gang Roster Evidence Improperly Admitted -- People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
Madden v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
This case, in litigation for more than a decade, has gone on long enough. [read post]
3 May 2025, 10:54 am
Bill McGeveran: Rogers was great, Rogers is dead, long live Rogers. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
It may prove just as effective in the long run. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 9:37 am
People begin to feel nervous about what should be standard government operations. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:35 am
"Indeed, even if [the defendant] had made an explicit promise that, upon separation, [the plaintiff] would be entitled to 'equitable distribution' of their assets, it would be unenforceable, as it would be contrary to the long-standing law and policy in New York that unmarried partners are not entitled to the same property and financial rights upon termination of the relationship as married people," Justice Gesmer wrote in Ericson v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:57 am
Long Island Railroad. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:30 am
I have no knowledge of this particular case but it does illustrate the fact that with the consequences of a drink-drive conviction being so serious (and at the reading quoted in the report prison, as well as a very long driving ban has to be a possibility) many people who can afford it are prepared to pay many thousands of pounds to specialist lawyers to fight the case. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:30 pm
Too bad they can't charge admission… http://ow.ly/4ZRGr # Chief Justice Roberts on law review articles: "largely of no use or interest to people who actually practice law. [read post]
