Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 41,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:56 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
State of New Hampshire v Purdue Pharma, et al., 2018 WL 333824 (D.N.H. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 11:46 am
This development may also moderate the power of prosecutors to whipsaw defendants — federal prosecutors intervening in state matters, and state prosecutors threatening deferral to federal prosecutions with the prospect of higher sentences. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 8:06 pm
David Schwartz discusses Monday’s argument in Kansas v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:56 am
” Blondin v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi challenged ITRSHRA in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 12:53 pm
This coal fuels the Genesee power plant in Alberta. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:33 am
In May, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Supreme Court of Kentucky’s decision in Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
Payne, 34 A.3d 370 (Conn. 2012); State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:51 am
See Stern v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:25 pm
So, I am cheating and calling an action of the United States Supreme Court a "ruling," which it technically is.Yesterday, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari in Shadadpuri v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
The philosopher John Locke had characterised the power to determine a state’s international relations as the ‘federative’ function of the state, distinct from its three domestic functions (of execution, legislation, and adjudication). [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:27 am
It is not for the public interest of Chinese state. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:13 am
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitOpinion Date: 8/27/10Cite: Gross v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 17. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
The test of Helvering v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:07 pm
State Police Pension Tr. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]
