Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
The IPKat is now pleased to publish this short note on the seminar from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer trainee Sebastian Wilkin. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Stewart v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm
Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:31 am
Short Term Disability Program, 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
It's short for "God bless you." [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
In short, laws helped to mobilize society to exercise a vast informal power that compensated for a weak state and small army. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:08 pm
The case was Gideon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
Anything short of full indemnity costs would penalize the residents unfairly. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:35 pm
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
United States, ___ F.3d ___, 2013 U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
Travelling around in cyberspace, and covering as much ground as Kingsley, is Katfriend Miri Frankel who, having only just penned a guest post for PatLit on the SHIELD anti-troll draft bill in the United States, popped up in quite a different area of IP with "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Copyright Expiration Date", here. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
On March 5, 2012, Burgos filed a motion asking the judge to reconsider the ruling in “light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in” U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm
But none of those would apply here, at least not under the assumption that the blog host and blog contributors are all located in the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, & Artemus Ward, The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford Law Books, May 2013) Drawing on data from the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:34 am
McKesson brought an action before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and, after much back and forth (the court of appeals has heard the case five times!) [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
It goes back to the Schofield decision to ascertain just what those "neutral principles" are:As the Schofield Court recognized:These neutral principles include First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
