Search for: "Smith v. State"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 10,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
A similar Petition for Writ of Certiorari from Upsher-Smith will presumably be filed in the near future. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
The Appeals Court in Smith relied upon, among other cases, Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
Gentry v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda Sutherland… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
The Reed Smith half is involved in these cases and they ain’t saying a word (not out loud, anyway). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
In Estelle v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Betty Boop Almost Lost Her Bling-Bling: Fleischer Studios v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
United States, No. 12-229, (recently filed) Easton v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:24 pm
"When you're a pilot, you understand why moths fly into candles," says Rodney V. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:16 pm
In that case, Bayou Lawn & Landscaping Service v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
To that list he now adds his own judicial biography of the man who successfully argued Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:35 pm
KnowlesDocket: 11-1450Issue(s): Whether, after Smith v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:09 pm
Anschutz Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:55 pm
Smith, but ended up dismissing the case on procedural grounds. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:51 am
Marchese v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
It is indisputably what it is -- and what it was here -- and the state doesn't get to define (much less legitimate) what a church entails. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
