Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 6401 - 6420 of 13,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 6:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
The international angle Up to this point, the drugs needed for lethal injection had been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States 14-510Issue: Whether the D.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Tax, of course, was the driving factor in one of two same sex marriage cases United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
Not a single Southwesterner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California does not count). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:54 pm by H&A Newscaster
We are eager to help you with your case so that you and your spouse may enjoy the benefits of marriage in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States, holding that increasing sentences under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution, and Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
  The Supreme Court’s Bauman opinion was a game changer, and after the false state of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we were pleased with the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in BNSF Railway v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:18 am
According to the Williams Institute, there are now some 390,000 married same-sex couples in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am by Patricia Salkin
California Building Industry Assn. v City of San Jose, S212072 (June 15, 2015) involved Plaintiff trade association’s challenge to Defendant City’s ordinance to require developments containing 20 or more units to make 15% of those units available for low or moderate income purchase. [read post]