Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 6401 - 6420 of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  The great majority of these cases get the back of the judicial hand. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, in which the Court held that states and local governments may use total population to draw legislative districts, arguing that a ruling for the challengers “would have wrought a radical revolution that overruled 50 years of Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:02 am by John Floyd
  What we know is that the court’s November 5, 2015 decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
The court's total deference to the stated reasons for a taking establishes a standard so minimal, it is doubtful that even the majority in Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:48 am by Dan Flynn
Judge Gering said the basement court room built for the BPI v ABC trial, that ended midway through its fourth week, is a valuable addition to the First Judicial District’s venues. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Adam Klein
Last week, Bob Loeb and Helen Klein examined the D.C. district court’s recent opinion in Al Razak v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But on June 7, San Francisco County Superior Court Maria Evangelista issued a temporary harassment restraining order (Adams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm by Kirk Jenkins
” Only six years later, the Court decided Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:00 am by Jeff Neuburger
The Law is Unsettled Although courts have increasingly embraced “assent now, terms later” contracting, Judge Sack stated, judicial acceptance of this principle has resulted in the “conventional chronology of contract-making” becoming “unsettled. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:00 am by Jeff Neuburger
The Law is Unsettled Although courts have increasingly embraced “assent now, terms later” contracting, Judge Sack stated, judicial acceptance of this principle has resulted in the “conventional chronology of contract-making” becoming “unsettled. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am by Lyle Denniston
  President Reagan’s first choice was federal appeals court judge Robert H. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
As to the employers’ argument that numerous individual defenses precluded certification, the court first rejected their contention that a collective action would prejudice their defense of judicial estoppel against those opt-in plaintiffs who failed to disclose their FLSA claims in prior bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:39 am by Gus Hurwitz
This concern resembles an issue currently before the Supreme Court – Axon Enterprises v. [read post]