Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 6401 - 6420
of 29,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
Having discussed the origin and scope of official minority categories at the federal and state level, this Article next turns to a second issue–what evidence individuals must provide to demonstrate membership in these categories. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am
Such a gloss would be inconsistent with the requirement of a high level of predictability in recital 15. [read post]
[Guest Post] 21 and illegal in all states? The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegal
5 May 2020, 1:20 am
While I focus Pelham matters here, the decision shows unity with the CJEU’s harmonisation of EU law, including towards a high level of copyright protection. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
What the GC et al decision does do is suggest an immediate and positive way forward for substantive data protection at a policy and not just judicial level. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
In its 2012 decision, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:47 pm
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference the case of United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 11:27 am
In Romero v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:02 am
In Cassell v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah of CMS preview the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court on 12-13 May 2020 in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:51 am
USPTO v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 9:50 pm
I commend this opinion on several levels. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm
All appeals in court at the domestic level failed. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
" The point of the law is to exercise an authority every State has: to provide more protection for religious liberties at the state level than the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 11:46 am
“ * State v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:30 am
” Harrison v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am
The Deputy Judge stated the importance of comparing the respective marks as a whole, rather than focusing on similarities and differences in their individual features. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Garza, as well as a number of important cases in state or circuit courts.) [read post]
