Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 28,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 10:33 am
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:02 pm
It stated that the reasonableness of a period must be appraised in the light of the circumstances specific to each case and, in particular, the importance of the case for the person concerned, its complexity and the conduct of the applicant and of the competent authorities (see, Case C-185/95 P Baustahlgewebe v Commission, paragraph 29, and Joined Cases Câ€â [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:09 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
is owed to an interpretation of language prohibiting billboards that display “flashing,” “intermittent,” or “moving” lights, contained in agreements between the Federal Highway Administration and individual states, as announced in a guidance memorandum issued by the FHWA on September 25, 2007, or whether deference, if any, is owed under Skidmore v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am
Paul Rosenzweig defended the mosaic theory in light of Carpenter v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
United States). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 am
Well, there are a couple of prior Ninth Circuit cases that fairly clearly state that in such an event, you remand with instructions to adjudicate the petition on the assumption that the petitioner is credible; for example, a 1994 case called Guo, which stated: "Where an appellate court has heldthat an IJ's or BIA's adverse credibility finding is not supported by substantial evidence . . . the proper procedure is to remand the case to the BIA for further… [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:01 am
The registration states “women’s high fashion designer ? [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:19 am
These are just a few of what is a growing list of companies that have offered to cover costs for employees who may now need to travel out of state to receive abortion care in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
[Ed. note: This case was handled by the Arizona FPD.]United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
” These assertions are obviously untenable in light of Article V case law and precedent, but writers on the subject had not looked for much Article V law or precedent. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 9:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
The decision was issued in September 2013, and is styled, Terry v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:48 am
The Washington State Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
Against that backdrop, next week the Court will hear oral arguments in Sheriff v. [read post]
