Search for: "States v. State"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 258,457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Co.Zall v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the District of Maryland (EEOC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Department of State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
Trump-v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The State of New York Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs [Justice Center] adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of an administrative law judge [ALJ] made after a hearing. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The State of New York Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs [Justice Center] adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of an administrative law judge [ALJ] made after a hearing. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:56 am
Freed, and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am
” And yet, in his five-page dissent from the denial of cert in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
J.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]