Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 8,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 11:47 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:23 am
Pathology et al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Health Care Reform: STATES GET $49 MILLION TO BUILD INSURANCE EXCHANGES, 13 No. 9 Westlaw Journal Nursing Home 6, Westlaw Journal Nursing Home October 22, 2010The federal government has awarded $49 million in grants to 48 states and the District of Columbia to help them research and develop health insurance exchanges aimed at helping consumers shop for coverage. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
United States, with Steven F. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:53 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, et al., 4-09-CV-03712 (S.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:53 am
., et al., the Second Circuit Court of Appeals observed that: (1) the complaint clearly centered on the plaintiff’s concern that the patents were invalid, not on the value the company assigned to them; and (2) the complaint did not allege that the $50 million value assigned to those patents was ever reported to the public or to shareholders. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
North Carolina (Granted )Docket: 09-11121Issue(s): Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of North Carolina)Petition for certiorari (forthcoming)Brief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief for the Juvenile Law Center, et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The issue in Keating, et al., v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
., et al., the Second Circuit Court of Appeals observed that: (1) the complaint clearly centered on the plaintiff’s concern that the patents were invalid, not on the value the company assigned to them; and (2) the complaint did not allege that the $50 million value assigned to those patents was ever reported to the public or to shareholders. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:33 am
Following its loss in the Supreme Court, AnimalFeeds International has voluntarily dismissed its antitrust action – Stolt-Nielsen S.A. et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:26 am
JORDAN, PAULA, ET AL. 09-846 UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
DIRECTV, Inc., et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Registration in a state of the United States does not entitle a person to use the federal registration notice. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:19 am
This was information, if I recall correctly, which had already been disclosed in the United States? [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 6:37 pm
There are several things that bother me about the bankers’ stated position here. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm
In the Supreme Court, the application for an injunction was Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, et al., v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. (09 Civ. 4515). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:37 am
” The Wall Street Journal (9/24, Mundy, Dooren, et al) also notes that GlaxoSmithKline PLC, the maker of Avandia, expects minimal sales of the drug once the rules take effect. [read post]
