Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 11,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
" In 1937, the Missouri Supreme Court upheld state-mandated racial segregation, ruling that barring a black student from the University of Missouri School of Law did not violate equal protection because the state was willing to pay his tuition at an out-of-state school. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 11:55 am
Well, according to the United States Supreme Court, it is not. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 2:17 am
Moreover, Massachusetts, California and New York each have their own respective law. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Leaving aside that the Ninth Circuit in 1997 upheld a virtually verbatim California constitutional amendment against a similar challenge – the Supreme Court, after all, exists in part to resolve such splits – there are fundamental problems with applying Hunter and Seattle to the MCRI. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
The state Supreme Court has 90 days to issue its ruling. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Georgia appellate courts have also barred claims against pharmacists. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:30 pm
JMBM's Special Assets Team has represented hundreds of lenders in California and throughout the United States. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
Representatives raised roughly $2 million in 2005-2006, while expenditures in state elections tend to be much smaller, ranging from $10,000 per representative in states like Idaho that have electoral districts with very small electoral districts to $500,000 in California's much larger state senate districts. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:41 am
The District Court agreed and granted MGM’s motion, stating “[i]f any part of the alleged wrongful conduct occurred outside of the limitations period, courts presume that the plaintiff ’s claims are barred by laches. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
California regulators say yes, but this week a federal district court ruled no: There is no health, safety, or consumer protection justification for such a requirement. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am
Lee 15-789Issue: (1) Whether, for federal habeas purposes, California’s procedural rule generally barring review of claims that were available but not raised on direct appeal is an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim; and (2) whether, when a federal habeas petitioner argues that a state procedural default is not an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim, the burden of persuasion as to adequacy… [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:40 am
The court stated that there are four primary reasons for this view. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Whether Brinker’s policy violated California law can be shown through common proof. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Smith for the American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:24 am
Lawyers Vexed by New Law Barring Up-Front Fees for Mortgage Modification Work
The Recorder
Backers of a new California law that bars mortgage modification services from charging up-front fees say the rules will put scam artists out of business. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:08 pm
Currently, 36,000 people in Colorado are behind bars in the state’s jails and prisons, and a total of 123,000 are incarcerated or under criminal justice supervision. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Evans, barring a state constitutional amendment in Colorado taking away existing rights that gays and lesbians previously had in that state. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
It also remanded for the court to address standing, preemption and similar issues with respect to Pom's state law claims. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:09 am
You should check with the State Bar of California to determine if any complaints have been filed against them or if they were subject to disciplinary actions. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
In 2005, the US Congress passed a law which moved some class actions out of consumer-friendly state courts into federal courts. [read post]
