Search for: "US Constitution Petition" Results 6401 - 6420 of 12,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 7:40 am by David Gans
  Today, it is conservatives who are using direct appeals to get blockbuster cases to the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Question #4 – Family Based Immigration Do I need to change my I-130 petition if I filed for my relative as a LPR, but now I have become a US Citizen? [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
It’s a question that has divided the federal courts of appeals, the petition for cert points out. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
The Supreme Court concluded that the “use of speeches, marches, and threats of social ostracism cannot provide the basis for a damages award. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:57 am by Greg Mersol
 The Eighth Circuit, in a 2:1 decision, upheld that verdict, rejecting arguments by the employer that (1) the case should never have been certified given differences in time spent among the class; (2) the use of statistics was improper and constituted “Trial by Formula” in violation of the teachings of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
Constitution (drafted in 1787), and its principles are reflected in the Bill of Rights (adopted in 1791). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:40 am by Carey Sias
Constitution (drafted in 1787), and its principles are reflected in the Bill of Rights (adopted in 1791). [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
Because Second Amendment rights are no less protected by our Constitution than other rights enumerated in that document, I would have granted this petition. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by David Markus
"Our view is that she's not yet been convicted, she's not yet had a trial, and under our Constitution she has the right to use her own legitimate assets to pay for defense," said Howard Srebnick of Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf.2. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
In general, one can only challenge grand jury subpoenas when they are irrationally burdensome (like demanding that Apple produce every document about iPhones in its possession) or for an improper purpose (like using the grand jury to improve trial evidence after an indictment has already been returned) or, very rarely, when privacy or constitutional issues are in play. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
In agreeing to hear Tyson’s case, the Court took no action on a pair of petitions raising similar issues, by the huge retail chain, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
Apparently, Enjaian had been restricted from using LawOpen by the school's e-mail account manager for sending inappropriate messages to the student body using LawOpen. . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 7:21 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 The probable answer is that it wanted to float new grounds for USCIS adjudicators to use as a script, much like the non-precedent 2008 L-1B GST case, with which to deny ever more H-1B petitions. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
He declared that the denial of cert. in that case reflected “insufficient respect to the State of Arizona, its voters, and its Constitution,” and that the Court’s “indifference to cases such as this one will only embolden the lower courts to reject state laws on questionable constitutional grounds. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Free marketers had nightmares about the racial and economic implications of a workplace Constitution, and unions did, too, for different reasons. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Cir. 2013), here, and noted the cert. petition here (item #5). [read post]