Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 6401 - 6420 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
The WHCA, administered by the Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (DFEC), provides a mechanism through which the United States reimburses an E/C for its payments under the DBA resulting from an injury or death caused by a “war risk hazard. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am by John Jascob
The Supreme Court stayed enforcement of the CPP, and before a decision could be reached the Trump Administration issued the 2019 Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, which repealed the CPP.The ACE rule established emission guidelines for states to use when developing plans to limit CO2 at their coal-fired electric generating units. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
Nowhere in the complaint does the plaintiff allege, at a minimum, conduct by the college "acting under color of law which deprived the injured party of a right, privilege or immunity guaranteed by the Constitution or the laws of the United States" (DiPalma v Phelan, 81 NY2d 754, 756; see Sharrock v Dell Buick-Cadillac, 45 NY2d 152, 158; Moghimzadeh v College of St. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
WHETHER [APPELLEE] WAS DENIED RIGHTS GRANTED TO HIM BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION WHEN INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY, IN THE FORM OF A NOTE AND EMAIL FROM [APPELLEE'S] DECEASED WIFE, WAS ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AND USED BY THE COMMONWEALTH TO SECURE A CONVICTION ON THE CHARGE OF MURDER? [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by Elyssa Sternberg
The United States Supreme Court established a framework for evaluating discrimination claims based on circumstantial evidence in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by Fox Rothschild LLP and Emily I. Bridges
Supreme Court could impact the wine and spirits market in nearly half the country: The impending ruling from the United States Supreme Court in Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm by Rosalind English
 In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm by Brandon Duke
United States (No. 21-40680), the Fifth Circuit heard argument over the validity DHS’s 2012 memorandum establishing the DACA policy. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Kimberlin’s Rule 35 motions have also been denied, United States v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm by John Elwood
Casey‘s “undue burden” standard or Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm by Florian Mueller
"Three weeks ago, Apple and Samsung agreed to withdraw all litigation pending between them outside the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
It was said by the President of the United States, but at a private meeting, where I presume he, like many Presidents before him say "fuck" and other bad words all the time. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm by Larry
United States is about a discovery dispute. [read post]