Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 6401 - 6420
of 10,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2009, 9:11 pm
His sex crimes scholarship has recently focused on the punishment and regulation of sex offenders and was cited by the United States Supreme Court majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
Redlich to tell a Congressional subcommittee reviewing the commission’s findings in 1977, “I think there are simply a great many people who cannot accept what I believe to be the simple truth, that one rather insignificant person was able to assassinate the president of the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
Learmonth Oral Argument - Jackson, Mississippi lawyer Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary More Selective Statutory Interpretation By The United States Supreme Court - Philadelphia lawyer Max Kennerly of The Beasley Firm on his blog, Litigation & Trial How does a trial lawyer take a vacation - Seattle lawyer Karen Koehler on her blog, The Velvet Hammer [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 7:58 am
Washington and its progeny, the United States Supreme Court has limited the reach of the Confrontation Clause to testimonial hearsay. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:34 pm
Cillizza suggests that a survey might not look so sad now, especially since the high court’s opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:32 pm
United States: Now What? [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:50 am
Schwarzenegger, Prop 8 Trial RECAP, 01/29/10 Constitutional Law Prof BlogSummary of the Prop. 8 Trial, 01/29/10 The United Families International BlogAmerican Foundation for Equal Rights’ Prop 8 Trial Summary, cross-posted at 01/29/10 LGBT POV [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:19 am
Is the test clear: refuse to enforce judgments that undermine the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States? [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
"I've talked repeatedly in this hearing about how technology will be one of the huge issues with the Fourth Amendment going forward," said Kavanaugh, who serves on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm
The Post says that the coalition’s “effort to hold specific board members responsible represents a new militancy in the fight to require companies to reveal their political activities,” which has grown out of the aftermath of the high court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:41 am
Corn v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:36 am
Now, Judge Widener is taking Senior Status effective immediately.Judge Widener graduated from the US Naval Academy in 1944 and has served with distinction in the United States Navy. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 8:58 am
Among others was the landmark 1986 ruling Batson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:57 am
" Judge Orders Interior to Re-examine Water Pipeline Plan "A federal judge in Washington has ordered the Interior Department to re-examine its plans to divert water from the Missouri River into an arid section of North Dakota, granting requests from both the state of Missouri and the Canadian province of Manitoba, which united against the project. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:24 am
This is the result of a decision the New York City-based United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued on May 25, 2012 in the matter USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court upheld this requirement in Crawford v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:35 am
In his book, Gordon Martin focuses on the lives and experiences of courageous black citizens of Forrest County, Mississippi who served as witnesses in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 8:00 am
She had been studying to become a teacher in the United States Virgin Islands and was survived by her husband and 12-year-old daughter. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:57 am
United States, a case involving the interpretation of the Hyde Amendment, which allows courts to award attorney’s fees to a criminal defendant when they find that the government’s position was “vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith. [read post]
