Search for: "Collins's Case" Results 6421 - 6440 of 7,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by MBettman
” Here are some examples (as a torts professor I have taught them all): Collins v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
But other than the conclusion not to proceed with the case, I am not sure that I would ever take that next step. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In this case, the plaintiff’s fundamental right to access to justice and legal remedies as well as the defendant’s right to be duly served with the originating process and to have sufficient time to defend his case are both served.[26] There are two points that need to be made here. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:15 am by Jack Goldsmith
I’m not completely unconvinced, but it is perhaps worth fleshing out counterarguments to their case for a select committee. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 2:24 pm by Cyberleagle
He noted: “It cannot be the case that where content is published etc. which might result in a terrorist offence being committed, it should be assumed that the mental element is present, and that no defence is available. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 2:35 am by Florian Mueller
" (American Heritage Dictionary)"the fee allotted to an agent for services rendered" (Collins English Dictionary)"a sum or percentage allowed to agents, sales representatives, etc., for their services. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Susan Collins gonna Collins.The same thing happened decades earlier, when the Senate's hearings regarding George H.W. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And do we care if the Court hears careful briefing and argument prior to a decision, or is it enough if a five-justice majority makes strikingly new law, as was the case in the famous Indian peyote case in Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:50 pm
The district court held for the LAUSD on the merits and dismissed the lawsuit.The Ninth Circuit panel drawn to hear the appeal consisted of two Trump appointees (Judges Nelson and Collins) and one Clinton appointee (Judge Hawkins).The panel reverses and remands, with Judge Hawkins dissenting.I'll not wade into the fight about whether the case is moot -- the majority thinks it's not, whereas the dissent thinks it is -- but rather want to talk briefly about the… [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Wisconsin Decision and the Decline of Regulatory Effectiveness”         [Abstract]    Daniel Robert, University of California, Berkeley    “Making the News: 'Space Grabbing' by Corporations in the 1920s”The Business of Air and Space Travel     Chair/Discussant: Joanna Grisinger, Northwestern University    Richard Sicotte, University of Vermont   … [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
“No way to know” was fatal to their claim, as it was in analogous cases. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
  The OSB’s requirements on platforms to tackle illegal and harmful content (rather than relying on “self-moderating” processes) might make such self-governing communities unworkable, expose volunteers to civil penalties, or in some cases even subject them to criminal investigations. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:32 am by Michael Lowe
  One example:  the Collin County District Attorney’s Office’s Special Crimes Division is targeting mortgage fraud prosecutions within Collin County. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
 In some cases, the defendants sought additionally or, in the alternative, to strike out the claim on the basis that the pleaded case, insofar as it related to serious harm, was inadequate. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
It is easiest to describe counsel’s contentions by dividing his case into two parts: a negative case, which sought to establish that the “seat of arbitration” is not the basis on which the jurisdiction of the courts has been defined under the Indian Arbitration Act; and a “positive” case, which consisted of certain propositions on the correct approach to jurisdiction under the Indian Act, drawing from the principle of party autonomy, the… [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:54 am
For example, the procedure to deal with cases of exceptional urgency is too lax. [read post]
16 May 2010, 6:01 pm by Steve McConnell
" Given that language, this case might be ripe for the sort of preemption defense that survives Wyeth v. [read post]