Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 40,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
In its decision, the Court struck down a federal statute that effectively limited sports betting to a single state, Nevada. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
Neal really breaks down. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Greenlaw v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:13 am
Prematurely, it turns out; last year the 4th District reversed the grant of the suppression in State v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:32 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 8:55 am
Case citation: Kimbrell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” He stated that the value of intelligence can only be judged in hindsight. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm
State Farm Ins. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:19 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
In relation to 'Strip That Down'; there was a clearance for 25 percent of the total, or 50 percent of the music, making it more probable that the claimants could see a risk copying being established. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
United States, a decision handed down on February 2 by the D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 1:08 pm
The only fight is about dicta: essentially, how much the Court wants to hint that the defendant might/should prevail on remand notwithstanding the fact that the Court is unanimously reversing the trial court's grant of a demurrer.As for whether getting patted down by security guards at a football game violates your state right to privacy: Stay tuned. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am
Haier (by its official caption, "FRAND-Einwand" ("FRAND affirmative defense")) only once on a total of seven pages (and not in a particularly important context), while Judge Voss's decision, handed down six days later, cites to both Sisvel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:43 pm
Bates and the UCS v. [read post]
