Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
This basis of jurisdiction had been recently applied by the English Court of Appeal in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 658 (06 July 2016) in affirming the jurisdiction of English courts to make blocking orders against Internet Service Providers requiring them to disable access to foreign websites that offered counterfeit goods for sale. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
The decision of Prakash and Singh v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:36 am
Conners v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:36 am
Conners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:52 am
” The De Well Case A prime example of the perils of the client-negotiated buy-out agreement is found in De Well Container Shipping Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:52 am
The style of the case is, Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
[Oral Argument in Moore v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:25 pm
The uni-polar model is actually the model of harm that appears to prevail in English privacy cases (the phone hacking case of Gulati v MGN being a prime example), suggesting it would be appropriate (on coherence grounds) to deal with Richard along its lines. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:34 am
(IP tango) Europe: AG Opinion for C-125/10 – English translation available! [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Common law jurists like Sir Edward Coke had claimed that the English constitution was fixed. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:57 am
Imagine a high school English teacher in an under-resourced public school that is 65 percent Black. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
In Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
See Universal Overall Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
In Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:07 am
Mr Mohammed was interviewed under caution with the help of an Kurdish interpreter, as his English was not particularly good. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 8:08 pm
Katiroll Company Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:31 pm
Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
(s.2(2)) The test has been long-established, and was stated by Lord Diplock in Attorney General v English[1980] AC 116 at 141H-142C: If, as in the instant case, and probably in most other criminal trials upon indictment, it is the outcome of the trial or the need to discharge the jury without proceeding to a verdict that is put at risk, there can be no question that that which in the course of justice is put at risk is as serious as anything could be. [read post]
