Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 6421 - 6440 of 16,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2010, 11:26 am by Steve Bainbridge
" Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has likewise stated that "Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:38 pm by Rekha Arulanantham, ACLU
Tracked: The Supreme Court Shouldn't Let Technology Trump the Constitution This week we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:10 am
To read the Senate's climate change bill, S.1733, click here.In addition to lowering the 2020 target for greenhouse has emissions, Baucus also hoped to attached preemption language to the Senate bill that would stop EPA from implementing a 2007 Supreme Court opinion, Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:51 am by Joe Mullin
That's especially true since the Supreme Court will take a close look at IPRs when it hears Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Dennis Cariello
CONTRIBUTED BY Dennis Cariello On March 26, the New York Supreme Court (the state’s trial level court) granted the motion to dismiss filed by New York Law School in Gomez-Jiminez v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 11:00 am by Marsha Tesar
Even if you do not live in Massachusetts, if you are caring for an elderly loved one and may or may not be an heir apparent, there is something to be learned from a recent case in the Bay State, Cheney v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 1:51 pm by Christiana Wayne
European Commission Vice President Věra Jourová says the United States must limit its national security agencies’ access to Europeans’ data before the EU will make a deal on transatlantic data flow of people’s digital information, writes Politico. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:01 am by Florian Mueller
Stark of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware just entered an order referring a handful of Nokia patent cases against HTC and ViewSonic to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:13 am
” Chief Justice McLaughlin stated: “The enterprise substantially enhanced the risk which lead to the wrongs of the Plaintiff-Respondents suffered. [read post]