Search for: "High v State"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
Cress v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:49 am
The district court last week finds punitive damages are warranted but remits the award to $500,000, throwing in some choice words about the officers and the state's willingness to cover the punitive damages for this unprovoked act of violence.The case is Magalios v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 10:36 am
The SJC recently issued a decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 10:36 am
The SJC recently issued a decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
Pennetti v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:51 am
It, therefore, went ahead to determine MCSN’s counterclaim and entered judgment in MCSN’s favour.On the issue of the status of MCSN as a mere exclusive assignee of copyright, the court placed particular reliance on the case of PMRS v Skye Bank.In the PMRS v Skye Bank case, the Court of Appeal reviewed its previous decisions on the question of MCSN’s standing to sue for copyright infringement when it is not an approved collecting society. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:47 am
Holk v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The provision states: "13A. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
The New York Court of Appeals has issued its opinion in Goldstein v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:42 am
The High Court decision Under TULRCA, s 193(2), an employer has a duty to notify the Secretary of State if it proposes to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at one establishment within 90 days or less. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:17 pm
(Ilya Somin) In today’s decision in Griego v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
This is undoubtedly a high standard to maintain, and will place an increased burden on the state in strained times. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 am
One individual stated simply: “People need to have high expectations for people with disabilities because then they’ll give them opportunities to learn and grow. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
This shift to state courts "is exactly what Congress sought to prevent when it enacted SLUSA" (Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
On 26 February 2020 there was a pre-trial review before Nicol J in what promises to be one of the most high profile libel trials of the year, Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:07 am
He further stated that, where the costs of reinstatement had already been incurred prior to trial, the actual reinstatement costs incurred by the claimant should be the starting point. [read post]
