Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 12,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Triumph Capital Group, Inc., No. 064970 Conviction and sentence for charges related to racketeering and obstruction of justice are affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury's verdicts; 2) the racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, bribery, and wire fraud counts were reversed on the grounds that the government suppressed material exculpatory and impeaching evidence; 3) the court properly instructed the jury on the… [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
In Breyer, the Court of Justice underlined that an IP address could be considered as personal data when combined with the additional information held by the internet service provider necessary to identify the data subject. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
Chief Justice Randall Shepard, after conferring with other justices Friday morning, issued an emergency order allowing Dailey to proceed with forfeiture hearings, but told the judge to refrain from any orders in those cases until the court decides the jurisdictional issue. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
On those subjects, his opinion should carry weight. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 8:05 pm
" In re Will of Liebl, 260 N.J. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ February 18 conference. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:45 pm
” The Timbs opinion hints that its immediate, practical impact may be limited. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
I wanted to talk with him face-to-face and form my own opinion. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Since we’re human, they’re likely to be petty, venal and self-dealing. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The Judgment The Advocate General in his Opinion (discussed here) suggested to the Court that the SCC Decision was valid; the problem was the context in which it operated. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm
Apparently skeptical, the Chief Justice characterized that argument as "one strike and you're out. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
In fact, the IP blogosphere vibrates:Leagal Analysis:IPJur: "SCOTUS Opinion in re Bilsiki is out! [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 3:23 am
The purpose of polling is to understand public opinion, even when it's wrong*, and not to re-educate the respondents. * Arguably in this case, since it depends on what type of crime, what time frame and what location we're talking about. https://t.co/lwe7PFDazU — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) February 15, 2022 Whether crime is up or down is a complicated question. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:31 pm
"Chief Justice Warren's famous ruling upholding the Ohio Court of Appeals' opinion reads like a point-by-point rebuttal of it.Everybody working in criminal law knows that 1968's Terry v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Option 1: Restore the pre-Smith Test The dissent thus points to one seemingly straightforward way to fix RFRA: Re-restore the pre-Smith case law. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/837791.opn.pdf In a dissent, Justice Stephens, joined by Chief Justice Madsen, argued that this case is about preserving a trial court’s discretion to grant or deny a special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA), not whether the State is entitled to affirmative relief on appeal. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/830231.ip1.pdf In her concurrence, Justice Stephens agreed that Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Dissenting opinion by Mihara, J.) [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm
I read the opinion last night. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 10:41 am
This year we’re asked whether to retain Justice Renatha Francis and Justice Meredith Sasso. [read post]
