Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 6421 - 6440
of 18,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm
" (1418) But on the other hand, "invoking broad legal principles" can also help generalist judges, such as the justices on the Supreme Court, alleviate the "cognitive burdens" of a jurisprudence that requires understanding complex technologies as well as complex and arcane legal doctrine. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 5:49 pm
It is done, and we're not going to redo this minor's testimony. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
The Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act is the result of a serious re-think of all the defects found in the Cyber-safety Act. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Spivey, Austin, TX, for appellees.Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers.OPINIONOpinion by Justice Bridges.This case involves the settlement of lawsuits involving Albert G. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:46 am
The bill seems to anticipate possible diversion to restorative justice. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
Github reports some counter-notices, but counts them in the same category with retracted DMCA notices, reporting 17 counter-notices or retractions out of 258 notices, which may each have identified numerous alleged infringements.[4] Automattic reports, for its latest data set, that “less than 0.6% of the DMCA notices we received were later subject to a counter-notice; of those cases, we’re aware of further action being taken by the original DMCA complainant only once. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:37 pm
De igual forma, organizaciones y representantes legales que son parte de “Ayuda Legal Huracán María” también colaboran con la asistencia legal por vía telefónica que ofrece el Louisiana Civil Justice Center a personas afectadas en Puerto Rico. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
The pun seems inevitable: In Wednesday morning’s oral argument in Class v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
They were solid, responsible reforms to the current system that would fulfill the mandate of Gideon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases like Ward v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:47 pm
From yesterday's Wall Street Journal editorial page covering yesterday's oral arguments in Gill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:47 pm
From yesterday's Wall Street Journal editorial page covering yesterday's oral arguments in Gill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:27 pm
The jury decided that Thompson should be awarded $14 million, but a Supreme Court, in Connick v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 2:51 pm
" -- Justice Hugo Black, concurring in McGautha v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
