Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 29,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2020, 4:34 am
" So, one answer is: We're responding to demands. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:54 am
"I think we're opening ourselves up to some unforeseen consequences. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
My legions of faithful readers are by now familiar with my dystopian view of where the Supreme Court is headed on 4th Amendment issues. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:02 am
Regular readers are familiar with our "Stupid Carrier Tricks" series; a lesser-known version recounts those all-too-infrequent occasions where a carrier "gets it right. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:02 am
Three readers, each an accomplished blogger, commented on the post, which I reproduce here, plus my own observations on their comments. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:22 am
re exercising discretion,??? [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 8:37 am
Yes, I saw all of the headlines, too, some of them to prompt readers to write me for details. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Such a deal – - – giving credence to the wisdom that when you’re traipsing in low places, it’s good to have friends in high places. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:02 am
Even if you’re for the death penalty, you shouldn’t cheer the taking of a human life. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 8:10 am
They're nothing more than a bunch of industrial prostitutes. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:24 pm
You’re doing a good thing for your friends and the salon (let’s hope), and now you’re doing good for you. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
Since the development of the original HRB method, “there has been no re-norming, no re-standardization nor any co-norming by contemporary neurodiagnostic methods. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
A loyal reader sends in this letter regarding a research opportunity for students: Hey Greg, I thought I’d write you because of your southern California contacts. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
This recent article by Kelley Holland in USA Today may be of interest to readers of this blog. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 3:56 am
There must be some problem with our comment function, because we received an email from a reader that the comment quoted below wouldn't post. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:15 am
They’re not “worthless” exactly, but they’re also not worth $350/hour. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:05 am
But we're all getting a bit bored of deferrals by now anyway. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:04 am
It may be hard for some SJ readers to believe, but there are good cops out there. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm
When you jump to Le Pelletier's site, you're met by Latin gibberish. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:41 am
I find that I'm often overly critical as a reader of other scholarship, so that's one of the reasons I really like the idea of JOTWELL. [read post]
