Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 6421 - 6440 of 21,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:25 am
"That's Mark Joseph Stern at Slate. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am by Gillian Metzger
  This is true of both Oil States Energy Services. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm by Adam Thimmesch
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:57 am by luiza
The case marks another circuit court’s application of the materiality standard announced in Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
  And they concluded that modern dormant Commerce Clause precedents rest on two primary principles that mark the boundaries of a state authority to regulate interstate commerce.[9]  “First, state regulations may not discriminate against interstate commerce; and second, States may not impose undue burdens on interstate commerce. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Amy Howe
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]