Search for: "Office of Public Defenders" Results 6421 - 6440 of 35,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2021, 6:32 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
That benefits the defendant – not the patient – because it means health care providers get to sidestep the bad publicity of a negligence lawsuit. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Congresswoman Liz Cheney succinctly summed up this position in defending her vote to impeach Donald Trump: “There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
": On President Trump's Inaugural Speech)In this spirit, and with the intent of seeking the moral vision of the person assuming office I considered each incoming President's choice of guiding or emphasized biblical passage for clues about the person and the possible tone of that administration. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 1:30 pm by Ilya Somin
As I pointed out to the Washington Examiner back in September, the same reasoning that is used to justify the eviction moratorium as a legally authorized public health measure, can also be used to defend a national mask mandate. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:29 am by Adam Schwartz
Even a site-specific ban—for example, just in public forums like parks, or public accommodations like cafes—would limit anti-surveillance activism in those sites. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Keith E. Whittington
There is no doubt that such a judge could no longer be trusted to faithfully perform his duties in the public trust. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:14 pm by Scott McKeown
  Not surprisingly given the wording of the questions, the summary explains that the public is in favor of discretionary practices, but hedges on other conclusions, explaining (here): Most commentators recognized that the Office must exercise discretion to help ensure that patent owners are not subject to repeated challenges against issued patents. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm by Phil Dixon
The terms of release included a condition that the defendant answer questions of his probation officer truthfully. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm by Keith E. Whittington
The Senate could likewise conclude that the constitutionally protected speech of Donald Trump is deeply inconsistent with the nature of his office and the public trust and appropriate grounds for impeachment and removal. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:42 pm by Patrick@nimblelight.com
The officer put the defendant in a patrol car and searched the vehicle with a K-9. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm by Bryn Miller
Dixon [3], the defendant sought to suppress evidence of drugs found in his car and apartment on the ground that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when an officer surveilling him used a set of keys the defendant had dropped on the ground to unlock the defendant’s vehicle and enter his apartment. [4]  The Ninth Circuit held that “the insertion of a key into a minivan’s lock constituted a search within the meaning of the Fourth… [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:47 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
If you studied in one of these fields as an undergrad, or worked in a technical field and are now pursuing a law or public policy degree, that will also make you well qualified. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am by Daniel J. Hemel
As Gerard Magliocca nicely puts it in an impressive and timely new history of Section 3, “Congress did not intend (nor would the public have understood) that Jefferson Davis could not be a Representative or a Senator but could be President. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am by Gerard Magliocca
Ratified shortly after the Civil War, Section 3 was designed to prevent current and former U.S. military officers, federal officers and state officials who served the Confederacy from serving again in public office unless their disability was removed by at least a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 3:27 am by Cari Rincker
As an assistant public defender Jamie led over twenty trials. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:14 pm by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
The defendants brought a nullity counterclaim, in particular for contrariety to the public order and lack of novelty. [read post]