Search for: "People v Word" Results 6421 - 6440 of 17,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It was suggested that the claimant should produce the fullest reasonably available evidence as to publication in all places in which the words complained of have been published ([30]). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 11:13 am
We publish this case because, based on the words of the statutes and their underlying purposes and policies, the ward’s right to have all of his juvenile records sealed includes the ward’s acknowledgement of the dangerousness of driving under the influence. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was described by the Court in Multani v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
To these principles, it should be added that although ordinarily words may mean different things to different people, the law of defamation operates a legal fiction that words bear only a single meaning. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
" The specific wording in this ruling should (only) be seen against the background of the specific debate between the parties in the Senseo-case. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:36 am by Orin Kerr
(Orleans Parish Sheriff’s Office) A lot of people have been having good fun with a short opinion by Justice Scott J. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Tessa] Significant News A big news item for me and my homelessness colleagues was announced last week, ending a court process that has taken 2 years to decide what Lord Neuberger meant by the word ‘Significantly’ in the appeal hearing for Hotak v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The relevant question is what the people will decide through democratic means. [read post]