Search for: "People v. New" Results 6421 - 6440 of 41,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Both are great guys, and very smart people, too. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:34 am by Giles Peaker
A new report by Prof. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” On June 16, Jacobs  introduced the My Body, My Data Act (H.R. 8111, S. 4434) with Senator Mazie Hirono and Senator Ron Wyden, new legislation to create a new national standard to protect personal reproductive health data, enforced by the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The unanimity of the justices was matched, to an unusual degree, by unanimity among the States and Central government (appearing as interveners in the hearing), whose Solicitors-General ‘grasped the nettle and decided to present a united front’ in seeking a new approach.[2]The decision itself drew upon both existing disenchantment with orthodoxy (or the lack of any accepted interpretation) and upon scholarly critiques, particularly those of Michael Coper (who appeared as junior… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
Prosecutor Christopher Mattei was preaching to a packed house in the New Haven courtroom where Rowland stands trial. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:02 pm by Ryan McKeen
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
  Here is the piece: Last week’s unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:39 am
Stevens   Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Allegations of Outbursts, Scuffle With Officers Facially Sufficient For Disorderly Conduct Charge People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm by sydniemery
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:02 pm
Since Peo-Wit is presently testifying for the People upon this trial the defendant urges that the rule established by the Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]