Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 29,241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
Superior Court (January 8, 2014), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) was called upon to determine whether the discretion provided to the trial court generally in section 2025.290 applied to the 14-hour limit on depositions in complex actions involving a deponent suffering from a potentially terminal illness or condition.Examining the statute, the Court found the language of (b)(3) to be ambiguous as to… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
Cargill lost in the district court, 502 F. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:53 am
The district court, relying on the Second Circuit’s 2000 decision in Simonton v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
Court Of Appeals, Second CircuitAttorneys Fees Law Firm That Claims It Was 'Solely Responsible' for Settlement Denied Additional $17 Million in Fees In Re Adelphia Communications Corp, 08-4904-cv Supreme Court, Nassau CountyLegal Profession Malpractice Suit Based on Cause of Action Pointed Out to Counsel by Client's Mother Proceeds Eric Reisner v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
ABM appealed and the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court’s ruling. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:25 am
In 2010, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a verdict in favor of Shell in a case brought by the families of the nine activists, on the basis that the Alien Tort Claims Act did not apply to corporations. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:46 am
Figure 1 shows how each district court (DCT) outcome was resolved in the courts of appeals (CTA). [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm
Boyd & Associates, 2013 WL 1927019 (May 10, 2013), the Fourth District Court of Appeal pushed this portion of Brinker to its conclusion. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:26 am
United States Gypsum Co. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1547, in which the Second District Court of Appeal found that same-sex harassment was gender-specific because the same conduct would not have been directed toward a member of the opposite sex and thus constituted discrimination because of sex. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
The second highest court in the land promises to re-assign the Stewart Parnell case shortly. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 10:28 pm
The Court returned the case to the district court for more fact finding and, in September of 2018, the second plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her complaint for the second time. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:33 am
An appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals followed. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:59 pm
Adams appealed from the trial court decision which consolidated three land use appeals relating to Adams’ request to replace a preexisting non-conforming bill board (Existing Billboard) with a larger, double-sided, digital billboard (Proposed Billboard). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 6:16 am
The Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Bianco and Reiss [D.J.]) rules that the district court resolved disputed facts in dismissing the case.The district court first got it wrong in holding plaintiff to the "but-for" causation standard at the prima facie portion of the case. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm
(ACI) appealed several rulings made by the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas in favor of St. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 2:19 pm
An appeal was made by the accused man as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the County Supreme Court upon his convictions of four counts of grand larceny in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, the sentences being concurrent indeterminate prison terms of two to six years on each count. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 7:45 pm
The orders heretofore entered by Justice Kennedy are vacated.The 9th Circuit's decision affirmed the Idaho federal district court's decision invalidating Idaho's same-sex marriage ban, However apparently the parties are concerned that this did not serve to dissolve the stay pending appeal of the district court's decision entered by the 9th Circuit in May. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 12:56 pm
" The district court held that it does, restricting covered devices to those with a primary purpose of reproducing "digital musical recordings".Second, because the hard drives in defendant vehicles contained programs and other non-audio material, the district court ruled that these were not digital audio recording devices, dispensing the second issue. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:07 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals holds that the district court got it wrong. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm
District Court for the District of Colorado. [read post]
