Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 8,568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm
Emissions Of Greenhouse Gases In The United States 2009 Karuk Tribe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
Anne Marie touched upon a number of issues which may or may not have been adequately addressed in the IP Enforcement Directive, as well as mentioning one topic that the IPKat has occasionally speculated on: the extent to which the very underused Regulation 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters -– which permits courts to take evidence on behalf of other courts – has a genuine place within… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
He goes on to discuss the now infamous hunting ban case, R (Jackson) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm
The case is Turkish Coalition of America v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Granted, it's only recognized in Louisiana, but there's no case out there stating flat out that Pennsylvania (or probably most other states) refuse to recognize it. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
In today’s case (Chouinard v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:39 am
Inability to obtain a timely waiver to reemploy a person receiving a retirement allowance from a public retirement system of this State does not result in a breach of contract LaSalle v Board of Educ. of Bridgehampton Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 02632, Appellate Division, Second Department Edward J. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
The United States of America and Australia, desiring to make more effective the cooperation of the two countries for the reciprocal extradition of offenders, agree as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party agrees, under the conditions and circumstances established by this Treaty, reciprocally to deliver up persons found in its territory who have been charged with or convicted of any of the offenses mentioned in Article II of this Treaty committed within the territory of the… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
KEYNOTE Introduced by Michael Carroll, Professor of Law and Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law Justin Hughes, Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Head of United States Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Professor of Law at Yeshiva University Cardozo School of Law In Geneva, working on GRTKF: Genetic resources, traditional knowledge, and… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:25 am
It thus seems a stretch to say that her conduct in speaking with and cooperating with the officers (however much in error) is atrributable to the state. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm
It thus seems a stretch to say that her conduct in speaking with and cooperating with the officers (however much in error) is atrributable to the state. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
".... ...As this Court explained in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
Cooper and Juliette V. [read post]
