Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 22,159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2014, 8:22 am
HIRSCH, AN EMPLOYEE OF BORDER FOODS, INC. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 4:05 am
In Pass-A-Grille Beach Community Church, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:20 am
City of Milledgeville v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 2:32 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8350000Read More [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:40 pm
In Carter v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:31 pm
While these same factors have been considered since at least as far back as 1998, pursuant People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The State Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's findings and conclusions. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 11:46 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:27 am
Affirmed.Case Name: DEON ALLEN LEONARD v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 10:01 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Melendez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:48 am
State, 57 AD3d 83, 866 N.Y.S.2d 711 [2nd Dept., 2008]). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:34 am
Obama and Gul v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
Then, like Edie Windsor who successfully challenged the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
See Padilla v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 7:16 pm
In the recent decision of Tulum Management USA LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 6:50 pm
Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:38 am
Although a party seeking to vacate a default bears the burden of showing a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious case, this state has adopted a liberal policy towards vacating defaults in matrimonial actions and favors judgments on the merits. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:09 am
At first blush, Crawford v. [read post]
