Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 155,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
” The Advisory Committee notes explain that the state-law “proviso is designed to require the application of State privilege law in civil actions and proceedings governed by Erie R.R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
” The Advisory Committee notes explain that the state-law “proviso is designed to require the application of State privilege law in civil actions and proceedings governed by Erie R.R. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:11 pm
Crow (Habeas Corpus Relief)United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
Passed legislation: Puyallup Tribe of Indians Land Into Trust Confirmation Act of 2023 / A bill to take certain land in the State of Washington into trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation, and for other purposes. - became Public Law No: 118-48 on 4/19/2024. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:35 am
The CAFC also declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a number of state law claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:07 pm
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid… [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:22 am
The Supreme Court of India released its judgment Thursday in the case State of Punjab v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
There is no express indication in the PHA that Parliament intended the provisions of the PHA to abrogate the rights conferred by article 10, or to change the law of defamation, which is, by necessary implication, involved in any consideration of the scope of the legitimate restrictions which may be placed by a contracting state on the rights conferred by article 10. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
In Ford Motor Credit Company v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:38 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:17 am
Kentucky state law bans lobbyists from giving to state legislative campaigns, but the state legislative ethics commission decided that an incident involving a Kentucky senator's aides asking lobbyists for money was an innocent mistake that did not warrant discipline. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:30 am
Campbell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:50 am
Carmelina Vera Rojas, No. 10-14662, and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Florida; Atkins v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Co. v.. [read post]
