Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 29,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 2:00 am
Cty. of Maui v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:49 am
Despite the need for general guidance on the legal principles in play in determining whether something constitutes a “building”, the relevant test is that laid down in Skerritts of Nottingham v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and Regions [2000] JPL 1025 and as adopted in the Listed Buildings Act. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
Although travellers may enter British Columbia, for example, they must provide a self-isolation plan that will be reviewed at specified entry points, unless exempted (also see the requirement for travellers returning to Alberta from outside Alberta by air). [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:50 am
[1] Megal v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:54 am
In that regard, the US EPA’s March 26, 2020, guidance is subject to litigation filed in the Southern District of New York, by various state attorneys general and environmental organizations, in New York v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:25 am
Gascon v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm
State and local governments instated facilities close and industry’s influence strikes again. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”Some 35 years later, in Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 12:46 pm
The second open informal consultation, which will now be the first consultation, planned on Friday, 29 May 2020, 10:00-12:00, is maintained but will take place online. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:37 am
” Terminiello v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
The findings will be published next Wednesday 28 May 2020 which is a few days later than planned, after more than 1,000 responses were received. [read post]
23 May 2020, 5:38 pm
Sterling v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
Instead, she asked Palmer to give her notice if he planned to testify so she could prepare how best to handle it. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm
However, the judge stated: [That defendants worked together] is unsurprising and would be expected for a project of this nature. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:21 pm
Willow Glen Trestle Conservancy v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:58 am
See Armas v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:56 am
As the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
