Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 57,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2016, 4:44 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Supreme Court last week denied Certiorari to the state of Arizona in the case called Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 6:45 am
In this case, the defendant was convicted of murder and has already spent quite some time in the big house, but the Second Circuit finds the state trial court denied him a fair trial.The case is Scrimo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled (in Nordyke v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court issued an order relating to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
” It is beyond me how a claim that was not even mentioned by the state court could be said to have been “adjudicated” by the court. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:48 am
Some of the amicus briefs in the appeal of Virginia v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
In Raiser v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
United States? [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:26 pm
See Kelley v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Bull (which was reiterated by the Supreme Court in 2000), in which Justice Chase -- way back in 1798 -- said:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Treating groups in the collective bargaining unit differently does not always constitute to a violation of the union's duty of fair representationCalkins v Police Benevolent Assn. of N.Y. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
By: Doug Christensen and Chris Amundsen On June 17, 2010, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court resolved the case of New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:55 pm
Their petition said the ban is identical to one struck down by the Supreme Court in its Second Amendment ruling last June in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:04 am
See Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
In ACLU of North Carolina v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:21 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
” Noting that the JHO found that Employee's conduct was only partially attributable to the disorders he claimed to suffer, the Appellate Division said that “the law does not immunize disabled employees from discipline or discharge for incidents of misconduct in the workplace,” citing Hazen v Hill Bettz and Nash, 92 AD3d 162, leave to appeal denied, 19 NY3d 812. [read post]
