Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 6421 - 6440 of 10,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
The rights of departing Dioceses have not been considered in any published California opinion....The tentative ruling goes on to review the California case law regarding departing parishes, and stresses that the cases require the courts to apply "neutral principles" in resolving such disputes. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:18 am by Ms. JD Weekly Roundup
JD Fellowship Mentor Angela Bradstreet on her Appointment to the California Superior Court! [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:20 pm by Cyrus Farivar
On Friday, a superior court judge in San Diego approved the case’s dismissal with prejudice—meaning that it cannot be filed again—which had been first brought in May 2015. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:36 am by Real Estate Mediation
Jim W HildrethOriginally uploaded by JimHildrethJim W Hildreth Mediator has been assigned a real estate dispute in Sonora, CA by the Superior Court over a partition of a Tuolumne County home, that includes a breach of contract.The mediation will include all options that will allow the co-owner to continue the residency, while meeting the needs of the other co-owner.Mediation may allow the parties to settle differences and thus avoiding further litigation..Hildreth mediates real… [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 8:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   The Lawsuit On November 4, 2019, a WeWork investor filed a lawsuit in California (San Francisco County) Superior Court against Neumann, WeWork’s board of directors, and SoftBank. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:08 pm
The wage and hour lawsuit that Vincent Howard has been following, was filed by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of the carwash workers, who claim that Kambiz, Bijan, and Edna Damavandi, the owners of Lincoln Millennium Car Wash, Bumble Bee Car Wash, and Santa Monica Car Wash violated California wage and hour laws. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:19 am by Megan Geuss
Fallon/Bloomberg via Getty Images) On Monday, a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge approved a $119.5 million settlement between Southern California Gas (SoCalGas) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 7:48 am by Michael Ehline
According to ABC7, in 2013, there was an accident at the Ontario Mills shopping mall’s food court. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:15 pm by Wayne D. Holly
  A California superior court judge affirmed the award in March and hours later Levandowski filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:15 pm by Wayne D. Holly
  A California superior court judge affirmed the award in March and hours later Levandowski filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 8:48 am by Florian Mueller
In that scenario, Qualcomm will have to prove in court that Apple actually does need a license to any valid and enforceable Qualcomm SEPs, and that will take time.It could be--but presuambly isn't--a coincidence that one day after the Wall Street Journal article, Qualcomm filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against Apple in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego (this post continues below the document): 17-10-31 Qualcomm v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:53 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
  The confidential records, according to the criminal complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, concern 11 sheriff’s deputies who are not named in the filing. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
Defendant COA, Inc. d/b/a Coaster Company of America ("Coaster") of Santa Fe Springs, California is accused of infringing Kimball's Trademark KIMBALL, Reg. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Superior Court; the defendant knew that Agusta sold its helicopter throughout the United States, and that it had an American subsidiary - since SNFA's ball bearings were custom-made, Agusta's distributors essentially were SNFA's American distribution arm. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:24 pm
Like the one in this case.So even though Section 3523 is a "maxim" of California jurisprudence, it's really quite meaningless.I might add, by the way, that this is a perfect case in which to establish this point. [read post]