Search for: "United States v. John" Results 6421 - 6440 of 11,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 10:16 am by Andrew Hamm
Kagan told the story of the first appellate argument in her life – none other than the reargument in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
DONALD JOHN TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, 1600 Pennsylvania, Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20500, JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, in his capacity as the person claiming to be acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Defendants. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
DONALD JOHN TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, 1600 Pennsylvania, Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20500, JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, in his capacity as the person claiming to be acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Defendants. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Federal Appellate Review post-Rita v United States Sherod Thaxton Book Reviews The Structure of Classical Public Law The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought Duncan Kennedy Barry Cushman Some Realism about Mass Torts Mass Torts in a World of Settlement Richard A. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by South Florida Lawyers
First, EESA and HAMP were designed to “provide authority and facilities that the Secretary of the Treasury can use to restore liquidity and stability to the financial system of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:30 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Fort Worth Division of the United States District Court, Northern Division, recently handed down a decision that would at the least be interesting to home builders. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:16 am
The Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Green & Joseph Oluwole, Hein v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, “which fires a loud shot across the bow of the administrative state. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:26 am by Kenneth Anderson
Today the Supreme Court is hearing oral argument in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (and a companion case) – one of the more important and interesting cases involving international law and foreign relations law of the United States in recent years. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
  Sec. 154 states that a patent grant shall be for a term beginning on the date on which the patent issues and ending 20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States or, if the application contains certain specific references to an earlier filed application or applications, from the date on which the earliest such application was filed. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Horne v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:31 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider the case of a commercial fisherman charged with violating federal anti-obstruction laws after he threw several undersized fish overboard. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:01 am by Ashby Jones
Johnson said minority enrollment has fallen despite the United States Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am by Christopher Walker
Rachel Kovner, representing the United States as amicus curiae in support of Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, brought much clarity to the argument. [read post]