Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2009, 5:38 am
Reeves emphasized that he was not defending sex offenders, only pointing out a flaw with the law. - Yeah, got to make it a point to say that, don't want to look soft on crime, it could ruin your career! [read post]
Terrible Ninth Circuit 230(c)(2) Ruling Will Make the Internet More Dangerous–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
19 Sep 2019, 11:06 am
If so, we don’t need Section 230(c)(2)(B) to police this corner of the marketplace. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
After considering the alleged $23 million-a-year price tag associated with this ruling for defenders alone, the quite sensible response from state lawmakers was: Don’t send so many people to jail in the first place. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 2:13 am
The registry restrictions don't apply to him. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 am
I didn't vote. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
DNA testing has given us a narrow window into the causes of innocent people being convicted - mainly false eyewitness identification, mendacious snitches, false confessions, faulty forensics, and ineffective assistance by defense counsel - but those problems arise every day in many cases that don't have DNA available to clear a falsely accused of defendant. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
” Again, that last one’s hard to judge because they don’t say how big the storage facilities are. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
” It's also about what didn't happen here but might happen in another case. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:27 am
The issue of whether continued employment can serve as sufficient consideration for a non-compete is one of my top wedge issues - those that clients often don't grasp and which are the subject of disagreement among states. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
I don't think it changes the legal issues and problems with this case, but I do not want anyone to think that we are belittling what happened to Pat. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
I don't think it's worth it myself, but that's something you have to decide. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 3:36 pm
Wolf in which the court stated that “courts may use neutral principles of law to adjudicate these property rights and they don’t have to look at the hierarchical documents. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
We have convinced ourselves that much hangs in the balance. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
Because I don’t care to be sued. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
(I don’t understand why the opinion refers to “computer fraud” rather than transmitting code and damaging a protected computer in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:28 pm
I haven't seen any evidence of either. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
When a criminal defendant charges that a federal agent carried out an unreasonable search or seizure, we do not view that claim as an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of the statute appropriating funds for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
(Would the plaintiff in Judge VanDyke's hypothetical really go to hell? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
" The CNBC.com article referred to Buhl as a "veteran financial reporter" who "knows her way around the Connecticut hedge fund beat" and provided a link to her webiste, adding "I don't want to steal Buhl's thunder, so click on her report for the big reveal. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 2:43 pm
Press releases, however, don’t have that promise. [read post]
