Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 6441 - 6460 of 14,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
Feldman argues that Black, the liberal originalist; Douglas, the activist libertarian; Frankfurter, the advocate of strenuous judicial deference; and Jackson, the pragmatist; achieved greatness by developing four unique constitutional approaches, which reflected their own personalities and worldviews, although they were able to converge on common ground in Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
… University of Alberta Faculty of Law Blog One More on Justice Brown In an article in the Toronto Star, titled Russell Brown doesn’t belong on the Supreme Court, a former law professor attacks Justice Brown based on two main themes: 1) He is not a liberal, so he can’t be a good judge. 2) The timing is bad and he has done some unethical stuff. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:07 am
Once we got down to business, I questioned him about Brown v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:46 am by Timothy P. Flynn
"  Jayane appealed Brown's ruling to the Michigan Court of Appeals. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:02 am by NCC Staff
  Arguably his biggest win was the case of Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:32 am by Gail Heriot
Imagine if the Court had deferred in Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, [*2]87-88). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 301-304 [2001]) and that plaintiff was damaged as a result of such negligence (see Bixby v Somerville, 62 AD3d at 1139). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by Viking
Brown, 669 F.3d 10, 18 & n.12 (1st Cir. 2012) (citing Wikipedia for its definition of "sovereign citizen movement," one of a criminal defendant’s "atypical legal beliefs"), Murdock v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
 I have students look at the lynching postcards (see the Without Sanctuary website) during a discussion of the legality of lynching.Elizabeth Hoffmann: I show The Road to Brown about the legal and social “paths" leading up to Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:52 pm by Orin Kerr
Destroying property is generally a seizure of that property, Brown v. [read post]
The majority (Lord Sumption and Lord Brown dissenting) thought it would not, though the issue was referred to the CJEU as the matter was not acte clair. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:56 am by Stephen Pitel
The meaning of submission was the central question, though by no means the only one, in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Barer v Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13 (available here). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
From Tuesday 20 March 2012 over three days are the linked appeals of Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, which will be heard by a panel of nine (L Phillips, L Hale, L Brown, L Judge, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Clarke, L Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]