Search for: "Carrier" Results 6441 - 6460 of 32,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2020, 10:30 am
Depending on the carrier, one's age and the face amount at (potential) risk, many life insurance applicants muSt undergo a paramedical exam (or more). [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
Agents, the few that have not left the business, are sticking it to the government and carriers every day.Too bad Obama and company pissed off some of the most talented people this industry has ever known. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 11:46 am
As such, the Defendant carrier’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted and the Plaintiff’s cross Motion for Summary Judgment was denied. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:20 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
” Barry serves as counsel to primary carriers, excess carriers and reinsurers based in the US, Canada, Europe, Bermuda and other offshore jurisdictions, handling high exposure matters. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:48 pm
What a difference a day makes:"How can the government force carriers to re-file cancelled policy forms, and how do they handle the immediate problem that these plans are unlawful under the ObamaTax?" [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The policy contains language limiting the absolute maximum the carrier may charge, but I've never heard of one actually doing so. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The Defendant carrier removed the case to federal court. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:10 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  The injured party recovered from the tortfeasor and from the separate UIM carrier that covered the scooter. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:43 am by Adrian Miedema
The court rejected letter carriers’ claim that Canada Post was required to ensure that inspections were conducted of public areas including the letter carriers’ routes. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 7:27 am
Still, when most US counties now have (at most)) 2 carriers vying for business, that hoary old promise that "you can keep your plan" seems even more quaint.Exhibit C: The fear of paying The ObamaTax is one of the most compelling reasons (and, for many folks, the only reason) to even consider buying an ObamaPlan. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:14 pm
Prior authorization is a pretty serious thing, and there's a likelihood that the carrier will decline to retroactively grant it." [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:56 am
             There’s a lot of wiggle room in the criteria for a pro marketplace-oriented FCC to abandon common carrier rules and regulations. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 4:41 am by Jon Gelman
The carrier got fax copies of a bill and report with a demand for payment. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:14 am
After all, he';s not forcing carriers to stay, just incenting them to consider such a move in terms of the bigger picture.After all, I've always been a fan of the 58-state laboratory model. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:05 pm
UPS, Federal Express, and OnTrac) which violate RESPA when Fidelity receives "marketing" fees in exchange for referring overnight delivery business to the overnight carriers through Fidelity's escrow subsidiaries. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Well, because I got an interesting email from a carrier [full disclosure: I can't recall ever actually writing a case with them, but we do get their emails, so maybe?] [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
”   The court additionally noted that communications between the Plaintiff and a Defendant’s carrier cannot serve as a substitute for actual service of process under the Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:12 am by Jon Sands
In a habeas, the 9th holds that assaulting a mail carrier with intent to steal mail, and placing the carrier’s life in jeopardy by using a dangerous weapon, is categorically a crime of violence. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
But the court found that the carrier's verbiage carried the seeds of its own destruction:"[A] reasonable insured could interpret the policy’s effective date to be tied to employment status, rather than whether an employee was actually working on a certain date, particularly when the latter interpretation would lead to bizarre results elsewhere in the policy. [read post]