Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 6441 - 6460 of 16,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
As such, it is no different from numerous such conflicts all over the world, where host states, eager for the returns of foreign direct investment and following the mantra of sustainable development, seek to develop their own resources in accordance with host state environmental and developmental policies.[2] In so doing, governments and corporations sometimes find themselves confronted by communities who, while engaging in local resistance, share the common language of the global… [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 8:01 pm by Marco Rossi
The Tax Agency refers to Circular n. 47/E of November 2, 2005 (Circular 47-E of 2 November 2005) which provides guidance on the interpretation snd application of the EU Interest and Royalties Directive, and clarifies that a company qualifies as beneficial owner of an interest or royalty payment, whenever it has the legal title to, and actual control and power of enjoyment and disposition of the payment, and derives an economic benefit therefrom. [read post]
23 May 2020, 5:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Where state action does not "infringe upon or restrict practices because of their religious motivation" and does not "in a selective manner impose burdens only on conduct motivated by religious belief," it does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Rees On Tuesday, September 25, 2007, the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:51 am by Reid Whitten
  The final rule, which became effective on December 26, 2013, does not provide any new rights under the Prompt Payment Act. 2. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:08 am by Joy Waltemath
PASSED—Nevada Question 2 (recreational use): The Nevada Marijuana Legalization Initiative, Question 2, has passed. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:38 am
So far, they have gathered over 25 examples but there are probably many more doing the rounds. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
May 2, 2013) (unpublished) Opinion: I hope that Employer moves to publish this opinion. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:35 am by Beth Kivelä
The court’s starting point is to examine the factors set out in section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. [read post]