Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 6441 - 6460 of 15,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2007, 11:40 am
I looked for e-filed US trademark applications (1(a) and 1(b)). [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 8:20 am by Jeff Foust
“If the Space Symposium does not meet your criteria, then neither does any other conference in the world. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm by Brian M. Wright
The rate of transmission reflects the number of people each infected person would be expected to transmit the virus to, with a rate of 1 or fewer allowing for a decline in cases or over 1 an expansion of cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
They did this through the infamous Omnibus Bills, especially C-38[1] in 2012. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:02 pm
Disclose It, REALTY TIMES, October 23, 2003, available at [realtytimes.com] (last visited Sept. 30, 2007) [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
IPSO 21023-23 A woman v South Wales Argus, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 21092-23 Joyce v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Statements in Open Court and Apologies On Thursday 25 April, there was a statement in open court in the case of Pretty v Sabin and… [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Geoff Schweller
” When the SEC finally voted on the rule changes on September 23, the “soft cap” was no longer part of the proposed rule changes. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Directive 307 provides that the agency will examine three key questions in every case: (1) is there a measurable difference in compensation on the basis of sex, race, or ethnicity? [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
C.A., April 7, 2011; Sept. 7, 2011) (34308) Feb. 1, 2013 Secured creditors take priority over pensioned employees. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by Eoin Daly
Considering that by the terms of Article 75 of the Civil Code: “On the day designated by the parties, the registry office official … will read to the prospective spouses Articles 12, 213 (paras. 1 and 2), 214 (para 1) and 215 (para 1) of this Code. [read post]