Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 15,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 8:15 am
For Asian Americans, the figure was more than 20 percent, and for African Americans, it was more than 15 percent. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:22 pm
It was 26 years ago, in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
" Pandora Jewelry, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
To put things in perspective, that figure is more than five times the margin of victory in that election. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:42 am
Bolger v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:26 am
Kate Spade LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:27 pm
(For a case involving the First Amendment and student blackface, although in a situation that did seem like mockery of blacks, see Iota Xi v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:23 pm
However, in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
The law is nearly a quarter-century old, and Zeran v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:52 am
See White v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am
If one thinks that such a design involves a term-limited Court, one should try to figure out ab initio what the ideal term would be and not take eighteen years as presumptively correct. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:05 am
Background In Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Esensten v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In that regard, the Appellate Division noted that the money damages that the retiree sought were calculated by using as a base figure what she would have received as her pension benefit had she initially selected the "Maximum" option. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 10:39 am
And why does Joseph Story, the author of the shameful decision in Prigg v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Gatta v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:18 pm
One of the most interesting and least-commented upon aspects of Justice Kennedy's majority opinion (see prior posting) in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:14 pm
That is the main take away from SGS Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
