Search for: "Health Insurance Fund" Results 6441 - 6460 of 9,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
It’s one of the health insurance pieces of the law that’s particularly troubling plaintiffs. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:05 pm by S2KM Limited
At the ASNP 2011 Annual Meeting, Cynthia Barrett offered her introductory analysis of how Health Care Reform impacts persons with disabilities. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:39 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Fadul used the funds in both the joint account he owned with his wife and his personal account for his own enjoyment, including a $155,000 payment to the Fisher Island Club in Florida. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:39 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Fadul used the funds in both the joint account he owned with his wife and his personal account for his own enjoyment, including a $155,000 payment to the Fisher Island Club in Florida. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
After six hours of historic arguments on the health law, the Supreme Court now begins its deliberations. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:12 am
• The reinsurance market didn’t recognize the different needs of small employers compared to large ones, and thus the stop-loss policies didn’t provide all the protection small employers needed.When we have these debates about health care reform and insurance it's important that the public be given accurate information. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
”An addendum to the "no child health insurance left behind" comment, there are a few states (such as Georgia) where child only health insurance can be sold. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:52 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  Also, Eddie, I hear your point, but that is not how health insurance currently works in this country (see Kevin Outterson’s fine post at the Incidental Economist here). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:11 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
  Of course, the federal government could simply link something such as federal highway funds to a health insurance mandate by requiring that states enact the mandate as a condition for receiving federal money. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
What if the federal government had a condition that you could take or leave, but you'd lose all your federal funding? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
  So, if there does turn out to be an actual embrace of it in the health care case, it might be quite cautious. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm by Ilyse Schuman
He claimed, however, that certain provisions would not be sustainable without the individual mandate: the requirement that insurers cover pre-existing conditions, and the requirement that they not charge higher premiums for individuals with health problems (the community-rating provisions). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
If we think about health insurance as being a series of security blankets, and we have security blan [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:18 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Repeals the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and related health-care provisions and enacts in its place incentives to encourage health insurance coverage. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm by Sam Skolnik
He also used his time to sum up the Obama administration's position that the entire Affordable Care Act will "secure the blessings of liberty" for 40 million people who now have no health insurance. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
"Verrilli pointed out that the secretary of Health and Human Services has never cut off all Medicaid funds when a state has balked at the conditions of funding -- that disputes are generally worked out between the secretary and the state. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
• The reinsurance market didn’t recognize the different needs of small employers compared to large ones, and thus the stop-loss policies didn’t provide all the protection small employers needed.When we have these debates about health care reform and insurance it's important that the public be given accurate information. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Before discussing the merits of the case, the Court must first decide whether the monetary penalty against those who fail to buy health insurance is a tax. [read post]