Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 6441 - 6460 of 12,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm by Rick
  I read the opinion last night. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 10:41 am by Michael Froomkin
This year we’re asked whether to retain Justice Renatha Francis and Justice Meredith Sasso. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Chief Justice wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Scalia dissented, joined by Justices Alito and Thomas. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  He obviously backed off from this, but one could scarcely describe his opinion as “Bickelian” in any serious sense. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 8:48 pm
   So his book is filled with quotations from the justices' opinions that are presented as true-to-life, pantingly-intimate, Sylvia Plath-like confessions of what the justices were thinking - in short, as the decisions themselves, rather than as public relations justifications for them. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:03 am
Justice Breyer dissented without opinion on Monday from the Court's summary dismissal order. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
 Justice Sandra O’Connor, while having been critical of Roe in previous decisions, joined that majority, finding that Webster wasn’t the proper vehicle for re-examining Roe. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:14 am by SHG
While it’s kind of Justice King, in her opinion, to urge the prosecutor and trial court to take “a more rehabilitative” (did Nash need to be rehabilitated from cellphone possession?) [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
One of the useful aspects to the Second Appellate District's decision in In Re Marriage of Hill and Dittmer is that the justices kindly include an Appendix setting forth selected portions of the prenup which were upheld as fully enforceable, providing family law practitioners who draft premarital agreements a useful partial template for language that will likely pass muster. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:36 am by Susan Brenner
In a separate opinion written by Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Dickinson, in which a second Justice joined and a third Justice joined in part, the judge raised an interesting issue. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Abe Fortas, writing the main opinion in the decision, spoke for seven Justices in stating that the Arkansas law violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:16 am by NCC Staff
The Court filed a one-paragraph per curiam ruling and each of the nine Justices wrote their own separate opinions. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:32 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The court's suggestion that it needed to pull this doctrine out of the air because the Comptroller did not act as a true adversary on behalf of governmental employees, after the Comptroller did everything in her power to close off access to birth dates except make an argument for which there was no legal support in Texas jurisprudence, is stunning.It is difficult to see how the chief justice, or any of the justices who joined this opinion, can claim a… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:23 pm by Kyle Graham
”) In all seriousness, if the California Supreme Court simply disagreed with the result in Nalwa, but saw the issue presented as a minor one (especially given Cedar Fair’s re-design of its bumper-car rides), it might have just order the opinion depublished. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Gus Hurwitz
Recently illuminated in the Supreme Court’s opinion in West Virginia v. [read post]