Search for: "Mark Case" Results 6441 - 6460 of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
The challenge for the owner is to avoid having the mark become the generic name for the activity, in which case trademark rights will be lost . [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Apr. 13, 2021) Not only is this case a good demonstration that courts are willing to give broad rights to marks based on similarities in descriptive elements (here the VAGI- formative in VAGISIL for preparations for use in the vagina), it also has relevance for the current discussion of “use as a mark. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 12:29 pm by Sophie Corke
Kat friends Karen Lai and Joshua Kwan discussed a recent case from Singapore concerning the appropriateness of partial revocation and whether R&D activities can amount to genuine use of a trade mark in the course of trade.OtherAsia Correspondent Tian Lu briefed readers on China's release of a 15-year plan to develop intellectual property rights, titled ‘The Outline of Building a Powerful Intellectual Property Nation’ (2021–2035).Reviewing Laura A. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:25 pm by Seth Borden
  Looking toward the end of the year when Member Craig Becker's recess appointment expires, current Chairman Mark Gason Pearce concludes the Board's report with the assertion: “The increased productivity in the last fiscal year demonstrates the value of having a stable and functioning Board to process cases and resolve labor disputes, which is exactly what Congress intended by creating staggered terms for Members. ... [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm
So is there a case for Ford here? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
should trade marks owners obtain defensive domain name registrations for their brands in all relevant new gTLDs just in case? [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Additional commentary on each case may be found at the linked TTABlog postings]. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:49 am by Justin E. Gray
Gray on Claims, in conjunction with Docket Navigator®, is providing a false marking chart that is updated daily with new false marking cases as well as status updates on pending cases. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
The CAFC (here) concluded that the Board had applied an "incorrect standard for fame," and it remanded the case to the TTAB for determination utilizing the correct standard. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
“Not all of the DuPont factorsare relevant to every case, and only factors of significance to the particular mark need be considered. [read post]
2 May 2023, 8:06 am
The Examining Attorney’s burden in this case is to show that restaurants operating under a particular mark also sell wines, branded with the same mark as the restaurant, and that the sale of wine is not merely an aspect of the service of providing food and drink to patrons in a restaurant. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:43 pm
It is clear that in many cases the indoor cycles marketed by Mad Dogg Athletics are purchased by commercial operators of gyms, sports facilities, and rehabilitation facilities. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:20 am by Alessandro Cerri
 In this case the Court agreed with the EUIPO that, whereas the documents produced by Sattvica constituted authorisations to use the Mark, they did not "formally justify" the transfer of the Registration to Sattvica, within the context of a signed agreement between the two parties as required. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Post-conviction appeals in death-penalty cases are far more frequent as well. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:25 am
" Was that a fitting climax to this case? [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am by Steven Buchwald
In this case, the applicant repeatedly attempted to sell the BROOKLYN-NETS.TV mark to the Brooklyn Nets, including one proposal for one billion dollars. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am by Steven Buchwald
In this case, the applicant repeatedly attempted to sell the BROOKLYN-NETS.TV mark to the Brooklyn Nets, including one proposal for one billion dollars. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am by Steven Buchwald
In this case, the applicant repeatedly attempted to sell the BROOKLYN-NETS.TV mark to the Brooklyn Nets, including one proposal for one billion dollars. [read post]