Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 6441 - 6460 of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 12:06 pm by Sheppard Mullin
;  A transitional post-grant review of covered business method patents (Sec. 18); and A change to the False Marking Statute (Sec. 2). [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:51 pm by Stu Ellis
  Marketing year sales slipped over the 1 bil. bu. mark, down 282 million from last year. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
Bankruptcy The basics of consumer bankruptcy practice.Mechanicsburg, Pa. (5080 Ritter Rd., Mechanicsburg 17055-6903) : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011.KFP81 .P4 NO.6653 Banks and Banking Principles of bank regulation / by Michael P. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Jon May
Indeed, the government has stated that some of the documents were marked “top secret. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
“Absolutely; it shouldn’t be eligible for the Mark [of USDA inspection] – ought to be treated the same as lungs,” wrote one agency veterinarian based in California. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank John for his willingness to publish his article on this site. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Interviews revealed a Congress that remains on edge and where worries about more violence are front of mind for many. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
Among them have been Camille Paglia, Debbie Nathan, Joan Nelson, Elizabeth Stoney, Laura Marks, Gayle Rubin, Pat Califia, Carole Vance, Marjorie H [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by Ronald Collins
I note that the two of you are credited not as editors but rather as co-authors of sorts. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
  In other words, the committee’s hearings should—at least in our view—be adjudged a success from an evidentiary point of view to precisely the extent that they would convince a reasonable person that:  Trump attempted to convince Americans that significant levels of fraud had stolen the election from him despite knowing that he had, in fact, lost the 2020 election;  Trump planned to remove and replace the attorney general and other Justice Department officials as… [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Justin Sherman
But taken collectively, they mark another concrete step in the United States’s campaign to limit the digital and economic influence of Chinese telecommunications companies both within and outside U.S. borders. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 6:59 am
It follows an end of year  tradition I started in 2016 (for those see here) and 2017 (for these see here). [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 10:28 am by Bryce Klehm
The report, titled “Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS) Lead Inspector General Report to the United States Congress,” covers developments in Afghanistan from July 1 to Sept. 30 of this year. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 8:35 am by Amy Robinson, Jim Waldo
Through the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Congress modernized the Communications Act of 1934 to include the internet. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:50 pm
 I have been posting about the review of the Hong Kong SAR by the UN Human Rights Committee (Hong Kong Within One Country and Between Two Systems of Outside Normative Expectations: Mediating Human Rights Under Conditions of Economic Autonomy and in the Shadow of Global Norms). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm by Richard Hunt
Others have looked at the holding itself, but I thought it would be a good opportunity to look at the issue of accessible kiosks generally to see how this case fits with earlier decisions and ask whether it marks a significant change in the law. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
”  There, I think one can say with some confidence that Bickel is truly simply a figure from an ever-receding past, offering remarkably little that is useful in understanding the contemporary Court. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm by Richard Hunt
Others have looked at the holding itself, but I thought it would be a good opportunity to look at the issue of accessible kiosks generally to see how this case fits with earlier decisions and ask whether it marks a significant change in the law. [read post]