Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 6441 - 6460 of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm by Bill Heinze
(quotation and alteration marks omitted). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Dan Tench
  But, he stated, the criminal offence of conspiracy is a continuing offence. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the state of Michigan in Schuette v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:39 am
Council Directive 89/104 ... must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is not entitled to prohibit use by a third party in comparative advertising of a sign that is identical with that mark for goods or services which are identical with those for which the mark is registered where such use does not affect or is not liable to affect the mark's essential function of providing a guarantee of origin or any of the mark's… [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:41 am
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:34 pm
The High Court issued a brief statement in which it stated: ‘At least a majority of the Court is of the opinion that the Act is not contrary to s 51(xxxi). [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 5:01 pm
This marks the 700th post for the blog. [read post]