Search for: "People v Favors" Results 6441 - 6460 of 11,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
  Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Prepared Testimony of Robert Chesney Charles I. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:27 am by Daniel Shaviro
 This meant that people practicing Scientology were arguably getting charitable deductions despite the quid pro quo. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:15 am
People who take very strong positions in favor of federalism and states’ rights might find that somewhat unsavory. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Commonwealth Fund Blog, Joel Ario, Michael Kolber, and Deborah Bachrach discuss what a ruling in favor of the challengers might mean for consumers, while in The Washington Post Jason Millman reports that a new Gallup poll” reflecting a drop in the number of people without health insurance “is underscoring the lawsuit’s high stakes. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
Clark; the Nessons' amicus brief, by the way, was mistakenly identified as a bottom-side brief and styled as one in favor of the respondent, but it is clearly a top-side brief in favor of the petitioner State). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:16 am by Michael Risch
That makes me wonder about whether a billion people on Amazon is better than a few hundred thousand people on fan fiction sites.And finally, Getty Images. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
Clark; the Nessons' amicus brief, by the way, was mistakenly identified as a bottom-side brief and styled as one in favor of the respondent, but it is clearly a top-side brief in favor of the petitioner State). [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Those people have close contact with and regularly converse with isolated judges. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by Kevin
That wouldn't be unusual except that in Bagley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:24 pm
 A summary of the case is described in Intermediate Court of Appeals Creates Public Trust Evaluation Criteria for All Boards and Commissions.The Hawaii Supreme Court took up the matter and issued its opinion in Kauai Springs v. [read post]