Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 6441 - 6460 of 12,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:57 am
“We took away that he’s a very generous, helpful person who sees people in need who could not have children without some form of assistance, who are often lower income or underserved by the fertility-medicine industry. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
He took issue with the terminology used in trade mark law. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 4:53 am
For the first time we also took the group on a field trip during the week. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Worthington & Anor v Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd (2018) EWCA Civ 1125 The Court of Appeal on an instance of tenancy management going bad, very bad indeed. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
He explains that the backdrop of the case is a federal regulation about observers on Atlantic herring fishing vessels, but that the court took the case not to rule on the regulation but on the more fundamental question of whether the 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
People detained by the state are vulnerable, all the more so if they suffer from mental health problems. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
Hodges (2015), Roberts took exception to the claim of the petitioners’ attorney that her clients were only asking the court to allow “a class of people who are, by state laws, excluded from being able to participate in this institution. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am by Michael W. McConnell, Pamela S. Karlan
Jack Smith took the position that the President isn’t immune to anything, and the Trump people took the position that the president’s immune from everything. [read post]